5 Comments
Aug 17, 2023Liked by Bruce Ivar Gudmundsson

To split pre-history from history I'd basically draw a line between civilization and before. I'd start history at various times, but essentially from the first Mesopotamian city states which also coincide with the first writing. That gives me around 3250BC in Sumer.

Perhaps the first "armies" in any sense too, and maybe the first taxes and dimplomacy we have recorded as well.

Expand full comment

Brethren and Sisterthen (Sithersen? Sisterns?)

All of Kagan's Introduction to Greek History classes are at the Yale Online site for free. They are awesome. We lost a great man.

https://oyc.yale.edu/classics/clcv-205

Expand full comment

Thank you

Expand full comment
Aug 18, 2023Liked by Bruce Ivar Gudmundsson

Wow, that question is a bkast from the past. I first engaged with history in 1978 while looking for answers to the question of “how could the holocaust happen?” I found that I couldn’t begin to understand unless I delved further into the past, so hello Otto von Bismarch. That only raised more questions and before I knew it I was reading Polybius and Thucidides. (Livy was a plagiarist). My favorite historical author is Will Durant. I learned from him the importance of studying the interrelations of factors like economics, sociology, arts, religion, etc. of different regions in an era. Nothing ever happens in a vacuum. Same can be said about time. Every era is affected by and affects other eras. Wherever one starts on their journey they will always find themselves in the middle.

Expand full comment
Aug 17, 2023Liked by Bruce Ivar Gudmundsson

This is actually, an important question. I have your answer.

In “discussions” with my ex-wife;

me: “but you just said...”

her: “That was in the past!!”

me: “But, you just now said it.”

her: “Still in the past!!”

Your answer: It depends entirely upon who it benefits.

Expand full comment